WASHINGTON, D.C., Apr 03 (V7N)— More than 100 prominent international law experts and scholars from across the United States have issued a stark warning to the Trump administration, stating that ongoing and threatened military actions against Iran likely constitute war crimes. In an open letter released on Thursday (April 2), the experts—including professors from Harvard, Yale, and Stanford—expressed "profound concern" over the erosion of international humanitarian law.

The letter comes as President Donald Trump once again ramped up his rhetoric, warning that "very severe" strikes could be carried out within the next two to three weeks if Tehran does not comply with U.S. demands.

Core Allegations in the Open Letter

The experts’ warning focuses on four critical areas of concern regarding the conduct of the war, which began on February 28:

  • Targeting of Civilian Infrastructure: The letter highlights Trump’s repeated threats to "obliterate" power plants and water desalination facilities. Under international law, objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population are strictly protected. Striking them, experts argue, would be a direct violation of the Geneva Conventions.

  • Strikes on Schools and Hospitals: The group cited the devastating strike on a primary school in Minab at the start of the conflict, which reportedly killed at least 180 girls. The Iranian Red Crescent estimates that over 67,000 civilian sites—including nearly 500 schools and 236 health facilities—have been hit since the invasion began.

  • "No Quarter" Rhetoric: The experts condemned statements by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has dismissed traditional rules of engagement as "stupid." The letter argues that such "gloves off" rhetoric encourages a "no quarter" approach (refusing to spare surrendering enemies), which is a war crime.

  • Illegal Act of Aggression: The scholars asserted that the initial strikes by the U.S. and Israel violated the UN Charter, as they were carried out without UN Security Council authorization and without an "imminent threat" of an armed attack from Iran.

Trump's New Deadline

Despite the legal outcry, President Trump maintained his aggressive posture during a televised address this week.

  • The Escalation: Trump indicated that the military is prepared to move beyond military-only targets to include Iran’s energy and oil infrastructure to force a surrender.

  • The Timeline: He warned of a major shift in operations within 14 to 21 days, a period he described as the "final window" for Iranian leadership to accept his terms.

Global and Regional Fallout

The escalating threats have sent shockwaves through global energy markets and diplomatic circles:

  • Gulf State Anxiety: Allies in the Persian Gulf, who rely on desalination plants for their own water security, have reportedly shared "grave concerns" with the White House, fearing that Iranian retaliation will target their vital infrastructure in a tit-for-tat escalation.

  • Economic Impact: The instability has already triggered record-breaking fuel price hikes in Pakistan (up 55%) and forced the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC) to raise LPG prices to Tk 1,728 per cylinder.

Voices from the Legal Community

"War on essential infrastructure is war on civilians. The observable conduct of U.S. forces and the rhetoric of senior officials are harming the international legal order we have devoted our lives to promoting." — Excerpt from the Open Letter of 100+ Experts.

As the UN Security Council remains deadlocked, the International Criminal Court (ICC) is reportedly under pressure from various NGOs to open an immediate investigation into the targeting of civilian sites in both Iran and Lebanon.

END/SMA/AJ